It has become a long-standing tradition among players to mod the Resident Evil games with unconventional characters, such as Thomas the Tank Engine, Shrek, and Barney the Dinosaur. These mods, although seemingly harmless and done in good fun, have raised concerns within Capcom, the game’s developer. In an internal presentation shared on their YouTube channel, Capcom’s R&D department expressed worries about potential reputational damage caused by certain mods. The presentation focused on the company’s efforts to tackle cheating and piracy, highlighting the difficulties in distinguishing between mods and cheating tools.
All Mods Are Cheats
The presenter of the internal presentation stated that, for the purposes of anti-cheat and anti-piracy measures, all mods are defined as cheats. This classification raises questions about the nature of modding and its impact on gameplay. While pirated copies of games are undoubtedly problematic, Capcom’s concerns regarding mods seem to center more on the content of the mods themselves, rather than their availability. The presenter specifically warned about mods with “offensive” content that could tarnish the image of the game and the company.
Capcom’s concerns surrounding “offensive” mods are somewhat vague and open to interpretation. The speaker did not provide a clear definition of what constitutes offensive content, leaving players to speculate on where the line is drawn. It is challenging to imagine that mods featuring cartoon or children’s TV characters replacing gruesome monsters would be considered scandalous. Interestingly, Capcom acknowledges that the majority of mods have a positive impact on the game, further blurring the line between benign and offensive modifications.
In addition to addressing offensive content, Capcom’s presentation elaborated on the reputation impact of mods. The concern goes beyond superficial cosmetic changes and focuses on the potential performance issues caused by mods. Players who encounter crashes, freezing, or save data corruption due to mod installations may seek support from Capcom, creating a strain on customer support resources and development budgets. These disruptions can ultimately lead to delays in game production and support for non-modding players, affecting the overall user experience and the company’s financial resources.
While Capcom’s worries about mods and their impact on the company are understandable to some extent, it is difficult to envision mods like fighting the Aliens’ queen xenomorph in Monster Hunter or using a banana as a zombie-killing tool causing massive problems. These unconventional mods may indeed bring joy and novelty to players, enhancing the overall gaming experience. However, Capcom’s concerns regarding potential complications resulting from mod support are valid in terms of increased customer support workload and potential delays in game development.
A Worthwhile Topic
Although some might argue that Capcom’s concerns are somewhat exaggerated, the fact that they dedicated an internal presentation to address modding speaks to the significance of the topic. Modding has become an integral part of the Resident Evil community, and the impacts, both positive and negative, should be carefully considered. Balancing the freedom of creative expression through modding with potential challenges and risks for the company is undoubtedly an ongoing challenge for Capcom and other game developers.
Modding in Resident Evil has evolved into a tradition that allows players to add their own unique flair to the game. However, Capcom’s cautionary stance regarding potential reputational damage and support difficulties raises important questions about the limits and consequences of modding. As the gaming industry continues to evolve, finding a balance between player creativity, community engagement, and preserving the integrity of game development will remain a topic of discussion and debate.